4.2 Article

Standardized assessment of walking capacity after spinal cord injury: the European network approach

期刊

NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 61-73

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/016164107X230775

关键词

standardization; instructions; guidelines; timed walking test; WISCIII; SCI; gait; neurorehabilitation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: After a spinal cord injury (SCI), walking function is an important outcome measure for rehabilitation and new treatment interventions. The current status of four walking capacity tests that are applied to SCI subjects is presented: the revised walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II), the 6 minute walk test (6MinWT), 10 meter walk test (10MWT) and the timed up and go (TUG) test. Then, we investigated which categories of the WISCI 11 apply to SCI subjects who participated in the European Multicenter Study of Human Spinal Cord Injury (EM-SCI), and the relationship between the 10MWT and the TUG. Methods: In the EM-SCI, the walking tests were applied 2 weeks and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCI. We identified the WISCI 11 categories that applied to the EM-SCI subjects at each time point and quantified the relationship between the 10MWT and the TUG using Spearman's correlation coefficients (p) and linear regression. Results: Five WISCI 11 categories applied to 71% of the EM-SCI subjects with walking ability, while 11 items applied to 11 % of the subjects. The IOMWT correlated excellently with the TUG at each time point (p>0.80). However, this relationship changed over time. One year after SCI, the time needed to accomplish the TUG was 1.25 times greater than the 10MWT time. Discussion: Some categories of the WISCI 11 appear to be redundant, while some discriminate to an insufficient degree. In addition, there appear to be ceiling effects, which limit its usefulness. The relationship between the 10MWT and TUG is high, but changes over time. We suggest that, at present, the 10MWT appears to be the best tool to assess waking capacity in SCI subjects. Additional valuable information is provided by assessing the needs for walking aids or personal assistance. To ensure comparability of study results, proposals for standardized instructions are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据