4.2 Article

Pyroglutamate-Modified Amyloid-β Protein Demonstrates Similar Properties in an Alzheimer's Disease Familial Mutant Knock-In Mouse and Alzheimer's Disease Brain

期刊

NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 53-66

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000353634

关键词

pE3A beta; Amyloid precursor protein; Presenilin 1; P264L; Pyroglutamate; Immunoassay

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: N-terminally truncated, pyroglutamate-modified amyloid-beta (A beta) peptides are major constituents of amyloid deposits in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: Using a newly developed ELISA for A beta modified at glutamate 3 with a pyroglutamate (pE3A beta), brain pE3A beta was characterized in human AD in an AD mouse model harboring double knock-in amyloid precursor protein (APP)-KM670/671NL and presenilin 1 (PS1)-P264L (APP/PS1-dKI) mutations, and in a second mouse model with transgenic overexpression of human APP695 with APP-KM670/671NL (Tg2576). Results: pE3A beta increased in the AD brain versus age-matched controls, with pE3A beta/total A beta at 45 and 10%, respectively. Compared to controls, the AD brain demonstrated 8.5-fold increased pE3A beta compared to non-pE3A beta species, which increased 2.7-fold. In the APP/PS1-dKI brain, pE3A beta/total A beta increased from 7% at 3 months to 16 and 19% at 15 and 19 months, respectively. In Tg2576, pE3A beta/total A beta was only 1.5% at 19 months, suggesting that APP/PS1-dKI, despite less total A beta compared to Tg2576 at comparable ages, more closely mimics AD brain pathology. Conclusion: This report supports a significant role for pE3A beta in AD pathogenesis by confirming that pE3A beta represents a large fraction of A beta within the AD brain. Compared to the age-matched control brain, pE3A beta increased to a greater extent compared to A beta species without this N-terminal modification. Further, the APP/PS1-dKI model more closely resembles the AD brain in this regard, compared to the Tg2576 model. (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据