4.4 Article

Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis within 4.5 h of Symptom Onset in Patients with Negative Post-Treatment Stroke Imaging for Cerebral Infarction

期刊

NEUROCRITICAL CARE
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 76-79

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-011-9523-x

关键词

Acute ischemic stroke; Thrombolysis; TIA; Stroke mimics; Stroke imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients with stroke symptoms but negative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) might have transient ischemic attacks (TIA) or stroke mimics. Brain DWI is important for the diagnosis of cerebral infarction but it is not available before thrombolysis for most patients to avoid treatment delay. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of IV thrombolysis in patients with a negative post-treatment DWI for cerebral infarction. We conducted a retrospective study of 89 patients treated with IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) within 4.5 h after stroke symptom onset. The patients were identified in our acute stroke registry from January 2009 to September 2010. Information on patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, neuroimaging, treatment complications, and outcomes was obtained and analyzed. Out of 89 patients, 23 patients (26%) had a negative DWI on follow-up stroke imaging. Fourteen patients had a TIA and nine patients had a stroke mimic, including Todd's paralysis, complicated migraine, and somatoform disorder. We found significant differences between patients with a positive and a negative DWI in mean age (62 years vs. 52 years; P < 0.01) and median admission NIH stroke scale score (11 points versus 6 points; P < 0.001). Among patients with a positive DWI, four patients had a symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). No patients with a negative DWI had symptomatic or asymptomatic ICH. Our results suggest that the administration of IV rt-PA within the first 4.5 h of symptom onset in patients with suspected ischemic stroke is safe even when post-treatment DWI does not demonstrate cerebral infarction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据