4.6 Article

Deep saliency detection via channel-wise hierarchical feature responses

期刊

NEUROCOMPUTING
卷 322, 期 -, 页码 80-92

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.08.039

关键词

Saliency detection; Channel-Wise feature responses; Squeeze-and-Excitation-Residual network; Hierarchical feature refinement; Softmax cross entropy loss

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61203261, 61876099]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M521335]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Research and Development Funds [JCYJ20170307093018753]
  4. Research Fund of Guangxi Key Lab of Multi-source Information Mining Security [MIMS16-02]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [2015JC014, 2017JC043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, deep learning-based saliency detection has achieved fantastic performance over conventional works. In this paper, we pay more attention to channel-wise feature responses and propose an end-to-end deep learning-based saliency detection method. Our model contains channel-wise coarse feature extraction, channel-wise hierarchical feature refinement (CHFR), and hierarchical feature maps fusion. The whole process is based on the squeeze-and-excitation-residual network (SE-ResNet) to explicitly and globally model the inter dependencies between the channels of its convolution features at slightly computational cost. Firstly, we make channel-wise feature extraction to produce coarse feature maps with much information loss. Then, CHFR is executed based on SE-ResNet modules to make hierarchical feature refinement. Finally, the hierarchical feature maps are fused to generate the final saliency map. The network applies softmax cross entropy loss in the training. Compared with other fifteen state-of-the-art approaches, the experimental results demonstrate the high computational efficiency and superior performance of the proposed approach according to comprehensive evaluations over six benchmark datasets. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据