4.5 Article

HSP70, the earliest-induced gene in the zebrafish retina during optic nerve regeneration: Its role in cell survival

期刊

NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL
卷 58, 期 8, 页码 888-895

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2011.02.017

关键词

Zebrafish retina; HSP70; HSF1; Cell survival; Retinal ganglion cell; Optic nerve regeneration

资金

  1. JSPS [DC2-9891]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture [1965447, 22300109]
  3. Mitani Scientific Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22300109] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fish retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) can survive and regrow their axons after optic nerve injury. Injured RGCs express anti-apoptotic proteins, such as Bcl-2, after nerve injury; however, upstream effectors of this anti-apoptotic protein are not yet fully understood. Heat shock proteins (HSPs) play a crucial role in cell survival against various stress conditions. In this study, we focused on HSP70 expression in the zebrafish retina after optic nerve injury. HSP70 mRNA and protein levels increased rapidly 2.3-fold in RGCs by 1-6 h after injury and returned to control levels by 1-3 days. HSP70 transcription is regulated by heat shock factor 1 (HSF1). HSF1 mRNA and phosphorylated-HSF1 protein rapidly increased by 2.2-fold in RGCs 0.5-6 h after injury. Intraocular injection of HSP inhibitor I significantly suppressed the induction of HSP70 expression after nerve injury. It also suppressed Bcl-2 protein induction and resulted in TUNEL-positive cell death of RGCs at 5 days post-injury. Zebrafish treated with HSP inhibitor I retarded axonal elongation or visual function after injury, as analyzed by GAP43 expression and behavioral analysis of optomotor response, respectively. These results strongly indicate that HSP70, the earliest induced gene in the zebrafish retina after optic nerve injury, is a crucial factor for RGCs survival and optic nerve regeneration in fish. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据