4.5 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Chronic Aspirin on Brain Arachidonic Acid Metabolites (Retracted article. See vol. 40, pg. 1094, 2015)

期刊

NEUROCHEMICAL RESEARCH
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 139-145

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11064-010-0282-4

关键词

Aspirin; Neuroinflammation; Eicosanoids; Arachidonic acid; Lipoxin A(4); 15-epi-lipoxin A(4)

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging, NIH
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [Z01AG000150, ZIAAG000150, ZIAAG000151] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators derived from arachidonic acid (AA) modulate peripheral inflammation and its resolution. Aspirin (ASA) is a unique non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, which switches AA metabolism from prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) and thromboxane B-2 (TXB2) to lipoxin A(4) (LXA(4)) and 15-epi-LXA(4). However, it is unknown whether chronic therapeutic doses of ASA are anti-inflammatory in the brain. We hypothesized that ASA would dampen increases in brain concentrations of AA metabolites in a rat model of neuroinflammation, produced by a 6-day intracerebroventricular infusion of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). In rats infused with LPS (0.5 ng/h) and given ASA-free water to drink, concentrations in high-energy microwaved brain of PGE(2), TXB2 and leukotriene B-4 (LTB4) were elevated. In rats infused with artificial cerebrospinal fluid, 6 weeks of treatment with a low (10 mg/kg/day) or high (100 mg/kg/day) ASA dose in drinking water decreased brain PGE(2), but increased LTB4, LXA(4) and 15-epi-LXA(4) concentrations. Both doses attenuated the LPS effects on PGE(2), and TXB2. The increments in LXA(4) and 15-epi-LXA(4) caused by high-dose ASA were significantly greater in LPS-infused rats. The ability of ASA to increase anti-inflammatory LXA(4) and 15-epi-LXA(4) and reduce pro-inflammatory PGE(2) and TXB2 suggests considering aspirin further for treating clinical neuroinflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据