4.7 Article

Gene expression profiling of peripheral blood leukocytes identifies and validates ABCB1 as a novel biomarker for Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 698-705

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.05.023

关键词

Gene expression profile; ABCB1; Peripheral blood leukocytes; Microarray; Alzheimer's disease; Mild cognitive impairment

资金

  1. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital [CMRPD140021, CMRPG870071, CMRPG881081]
  2. National Science Council (NSC) [96-2314-B-010-051]
  3. Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan [V95ER3-002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing evidence has shown that the immunological reaction of leukocytes plays a crucial role in the development of neurodegenerative disorders. We conducted transcriptome analysis of leukocytes from patients of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer's disease (AD), as well as normal controls (NC) by oligonucleotide microarray. The differentially expressed genes of interest were selected by pathway-based functional enrichment and were then validated in 60 subjects (17 NC, 20 MCI and 23 AD) by quantitative PCR (QRT-PCR). Thirty-four differentially expressed genes between NC and AD were enriched in ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, ascorbate and aldarate metabolism, Gly/Ser/Thr metabolism, transforming growth factor-beta signaling, and extracellular matrix (ECM)-receptor interaction pathways (Welch t-test; p<0.05). Comparison of NC, MCI and AD transcriptomes identified 8 genes significantly associated with purine metabolism and the ABC transporters. Furthermore, 13 out of 18 genes selected from the above lists were successfully validated by QRT-PCR (Mann-Whitney U-test), and only ABCB1 gene exhibited significantly positive correlation with MMSE scores among NC, MCI, and AD subjects (r = 0.3858,p = 0.0011). With a limited number of study population, our study may provide a novel direction for evaluating diagnostic biomarkers in monitoring AD progression. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据