4.5 Article

Regulation of cortical and striatal 5-HT1A receptors in the MPTP-lesioned macaque

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.09.011

关键词

5-HT1A receptors; Parkinson's disease; Dyskinesia; MPTP-lesioned primate; Autoradiographic binding

资金

  1. Acadia
  2. Asubio
  3. Merz
  4. Merk Serono
  5. Novartis
  6. Teva
  7. Biovail
  8. Atuka Ltd.
  9. Cure Parkinson's Trust
  10. Krembil Foundation
  11. Edmond J. Safra Philanthropic Foundation
  12. Parkinson Society Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Serotonergic 1A (5-HT1A) receptor agonists reduce L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA)-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD), though the mechanism(s) and site(s) of action remain unclear. We employed [H-3]-WAY 100,635 autoradiographic receptor binding to measure 5-HT1A receptor levels in 4 groups of macaques: normal (vehicle-vehicle); 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-lesioned, without exposure to L-DOPA, i.e., untreated parkinsonian (MPTP-vehicle); MPTP-lesioned, receiving a single administration of L-DOPA to alleviate parkinsonism (MPTP-L-DOPA-acute); and MPTP-lesioned, chronically treated with L-DOPA, parkinsonism alleviated but exhibiting dyskinesia (MPTP-L-DOPA-chronic). We demonstrate that 5-HT1A receptor binding decreases (by 10%-20%, p < 0.05) in the external layers, but increases (by 80%-100%, p < 0.05) in the middle layers, of the premotor and motor cortex of all MPTP-lesioned macaques. In the striosomes of the caudate nucleus, 5-HT1A receptor binding increases in MPTP-vehicle macaques (by 50%, p < 0.05), compared with normal macaques. While 5-HT1A receptor binding is low in the matrix of the caudate nucleus in normal macaques, it increases (by 200%, p < 0.05) in MPTP-L-DOPA-chronic macaques. These data suggest that 5-HT1A receptors are involved in the pathophysiology of both parkinsonism and complications of L-DOPA therapy. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据