4.6 Article

Body mass index has no effect on rate of progression of chronic kidney disease in non-diabetic subjects

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 27, 期 7, 页码 2776-2780

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr757

关键词

chronic kidney disease; eGFR; non-diabetic; obesity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rebecca Brown and colleagues examine the association between BMI and kidney disease progression among 499 adults with established stage 3-5 CKD in the absence of diabetes...the analysis showed no significant difference in annual eGFR decline by obesity status...Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasingly prevalent worldwide. Furthermore, obesity is now a global problem with major health implications. There is a clear association between obesity and the development of CKD but it is not known whether obesity is a risk factor for the progression of pre-existing kidney disease. We examined the relationship between the body mass index (BMI) and the rate of progression of CKD in non-diabetic adults. The Chronic Renal Insufficiency Standards Implementation Study (CRISIS) is a prospective observational study in a predominantly white population in Greater Manchester. From the CRISIS database, we assessed rate of progression of CKD in 499 adults attending the hospital. Baseline measurements including BMI were obtained and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was monitored. The rate of deterioration of eGFR was derived over time, defined as eGFR (mL/min/1.73m(2)/year) and assessed using univariate analysis of variance. In the groups as a whole, no relationship between BMI and eGFR was shown. Dividing the subjects into obese (BMI epsilon 30) and non-obese (BMI 30) groups and further breakdown into CKD stages 3, 4 and 5, also showed no relationship between BMI and eGFR. Univariate analysis of variance was used. Neither BMI as a continuous variable nor obesity (BMI epsilon 30) as a categorical variable was associated with an increased rate of progression of existing CKD in this predominantly white population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据