4.6 Article

The value of simultaneous measurements of urinary albumin and total protein in proteinuric patients

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 1534-1541

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr708

关键词

renal dysfunction; tubular pathology; urine albumin to creatinine ratio; urine albumin to protein ratio; urine protein to creatinine ratio

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Proteinuria is a common pathological finding in renal disease. Examining the urinary protein electrophoretic pattern gives clues to the site of origin of the protein. We hypothesized that the type of proteinuria, classified by urine protein electrophoresis and immunofixation (uPEI), may be predicted by simply examining the proportion of higher molecular weight protein (e.g. albumin) in urine total protein content. Methods. One thousand and eleven patients, whose urine had been sent to the pathology department for uPEI, were analysed for total protein and albumin to creatinine ratio (uPCR and uACR) and the ratio reported as the albumin to total protein ratio (uAPR). In a group of renal outpatients (n = 248), we also specifically measured tubular proteins (N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, NAG, and beta(2)-microglobulin) and expressed these as ratios to creatinine (uNCR and u beta 2CR). To validate these findings, we correlated these measurements with 68 patients in whom we also had renal biopsy data. Results. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the AUC for uAPR was 0.84 for predicting tubular proteinuria pattern on uPEI. In the renal outpatient subgroup, uAPR predicted a tubular pattern of urinary protein equally as well as testing for specific tubular protein markers (uNCR and u beta 2CR). In the validation cohort, a uAPR cut-off of <0.40 was 88% sensitive and 99% specific for the diagnosis of primary tubulointerstitial disorders on renal biopsy. Conclusions. Useful information about the origins of urinary protein may be inferred by measuring uAPR, the measurement of which is both simple and inexpensive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据