4.6 Article

Prevention of accelerated atherosclerosis by AT1 receptor blockade in experimental renal failure

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 832-838

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq524

关键词

angiotensin; AT1 receptor blockers; atherosclerosis; uraemia

资金

  1. Ministero dell'Universita e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica of Italy
  2. Italian Society of Hypertension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The mechanisms of uraemia-induced atherosclerosis have not been fully delineated. The aims of this study were (i) to investigate the extent and the phenotype of atherosclerosis, including the activation of local renin-angiotensin system (RAS), in a mouse model of mild uraemia and (ii) to determine the effects of angiotensin II type1 (AT1) receptor blockade on the uraemic atherosclerosis, clarifying the mechanisms of its action. Methods. Mild uraemia was induced by 5/6 nephrectomy in 8-week-old apo E-deficient mice (apoE-KO). After nephrectomy, the animals received either treatment with candesartan or no treatment for 12-weeks. Sham-operated apoE-KO mice were used as controls. Results. Uraemia led to a two-fold increase in aortic plaque area. This was associated with a significant upregulation of aortic angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), AT1 receptor, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1. Candesartan significantly reduced aortic atherosclerosis, prevented the upregulation of the uraemia-induced genes and led to changes predicting greater stability of the plaques, without influencing blood pressure or serum lipids. Conclusions. This study indicates that uraemia leads to an acceleration of aortic atherosclerosis. The upregulation of aortic RAS and the reduced atherosclerosis following AT1 receptor blocker treatment highlights the pivotal role of the local RAS in the development and acceleration of atherosclerosis in uraemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据