4.6 Article

The Danish Registry on Regular Dialysis and Transplantation:completeness and validity of incident patient registration

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 947-951

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfp571

关键词

completeness; end-stage renal disease; national registry; validation

资金

  1. Research Fund of The Danish society of Nephrology
  2. The Research Fund of The Danish Kidney Society
  3. TrygFonden
  4. Helen and Ejnar Bjoernow Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methods. Incident patients on chronic RRT in the period 2001-2004 were identified in NRDT and in the National Patient Registry, which contains information on hospital admissions and treatments. In the National Patient Registry, identification of patients was as follows: patients receiving the procedure of dialysis during a minimum of 90 days and for a minimum of 12 times or the procedure of renal transplantation. Only patients with at least 2 years of dialysis-free interval before and never being transplanted were included. The completeness of NRDT was calculated as the percentage of new patients on chronic RRT registered in the National Patient Registry also found in NRDT. Validity of data in NRDT was assessed by information from medical records and analysed using kappa statistics. Results. Completeness of NRDT: Of 3020 patients registered in the National Patient Registry as incident chronic RRT patients, 97.2% were found in NRDT but 22.5% with another year of entry. There were no differences in completeness between hospitals or regions. Validity of NRDT: Validity of common renal diagnoses and RRT modality was high: diabetic nephropathy (kappa = 0.98), adult polycystic kidney disease (kappa = 0.95), chronic glomerulonephritis (kappa = 0.78) and RRT modality (kappa = 0.94). The diagnosis CKD of unknown aetiology and type of diabetes were less valid (kappa = 0.62, 0.60 and 0.73, respectively). The date of RRT start had also high validity. Conclusions. Completeness of incident patient registration in NRDT was highly acceptable. Validity of incident patient data was also good, except for type of diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据