4.6 Article

Influence of low birth weight on minimal change nephrotic syndrome in children, including a meta-analysis

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 1615-1620

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfm829

关键词

children; intrauterine growth restriction; low birth weight; meta-analysis; minimal change nephrotic syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Low birth weight (LBW) has been shown to lead to a low nephron endowment with subsequent glomerular hyperfiltration. Additional renal disease can therefore be expected to have a more severe course. Minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) is a common chronic illness in childhood. As it is important to be able to predict prognosis in MCNS, we set out to study the effect of LBW on MCNS in a cohort of patients from our University Medical Center, and performed a meta-analysis. Methods. A retrospective chart review of children with MCNS treated at the VU University Medical Center was performed, identifying 55 patients of whom 4 had LBW. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (The Cochrane Collaboration). Results. The meta-analysis consisted of 201 patients (25 LBW, 176 normal birth weight). More LBW patients were classified as steroid resistant [odds ratio (OR) 6.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.02-24.04), P = 0.002]. The number of relapses per year of follow-up was significantly higher in the LBW patients with MCNS [weighted mean difference 0.93 (95% CI 0.71-1.15) relapse per year, P < 0.0001]. MCNS patients with LBW were significantly more likely to be treated with cyclosporine [OR 4.4 (95% CI 1.7-11.8), P = 0.003] or cytotoxic agents [OR 4.2 (95% CI 1.8-10.2), P = 0.001] during the course of their disease, and they had a higher chance of developing several complications during the follow-up period, including hypertension. Conclusions. This meta-analysis provides support for an adverse effect of LBW on the course and prognosis of MCNS in children, which can aid clinicians and parents in assessing the expected clinical course.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据