4.3 Article

Clinical usefulness of serum cystatin C and the pertinent estimation of glomerular filtration rate based on cystatin C

期刊

NEPHROLOGY
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 768-776

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01344.x

关键词

cystatin C; glomerular filtration rate; inulin clearance

资金

  1. Korean Society of Nephrology, Republic of Korea [H-0701-006-193]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Although cystatin C has been developed as an alternative marker for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR), its clinical use is as yet limited. The significance of cystatin C for differentiating chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages and established cystatin C-based equations estimating GFR were evaluated. Methods: The fresh frozen serum samples from CKD (n = 119) and healthy volunteers (n = 22) were evaluated. Serum creatinine (sCr) was measured by the kinetic Jaffe method, and recalibrated to the isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS). Cystatin C was measured using a particle-enhanced nephelometric assay. Results: CKD stages were more sensitively differentiated by cystatin C compared to sCr, especially in moderate and severe kidney dysfunction. Sex and body mass index did not affect cystatin C level. Pearson's correlation coefficients of reciprocal of cystatin C, measured and recalibrated sCr compared to systemic inulin clearance (Cl-in) were 0.757, 0.734 and 0.709, respectively. We derived novel pertinent equations based on cystatin C (model 1: 1.404 x cystatin C-0.895 x age0.006 x weight1.074 x height-1.562 x (0.865; if female); model 2: 43.287 x cystatin C-0.906 x age0.101 x (0.762; if female)]. Models 1 and 2 showed superior performance in representing systemic Cl-in than the IDMS Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equations did (adjusted r2 = 0.76 and 0.72 for models 1 and 2, and 0.64 and 0.65 for 4 and 6 variable IDMS MDRD equations, respectively). Conclusion: Cystatin C reflects kidney dysfunction sensitively, and thus cystatin C-based estimation of GFR could provide a reliable support for clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据