4.3 Review

A Review of Cord Blood Concentrations of Iron Status Parameters to Define Reference Ranges for Preterm Infants

期刊

NEONATOLOGY
卷 104, 期 3, 页码 194-202

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000353161

关键词

Iron deficiency; Premature infant; Cord blood; Hemoglobin; Mean corpuscular volume; Soluble transferrin receptor; Transferrin saturation; Reticulocyte hemoglobin content; Zinc protoporphyrin/heme ratio; Hepcidin

资金

  1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Tubingen [283-0-0]
  2. NIH [HD 29421]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Iron plays an essential role in various tissue functions, and hence the reliable assessment of iron nutrition status of preterm infants appears to be mandatory. Objectives:To summarize available data on cord blood concentrations of iron status parameters as surrogate reference ranges for preterm infants until term-equivalent age. Methods: Review of the literature searching PubMed for cord blood values of hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, ferritin, soluble transferrin receptor, ferritin index, transferrin saturation, reticulocyte hemoglobin content, zinc protoporphyrin/heme ratio, and hepcidin and comparison with reference ranges established for adults. Results: Gestational age-specific cord blood concentration ranges at term were computed as weighted mean for hemoglobin [15.9 g/dl (13.3-18.4)], mean corpuscular volume [108.1 fl (97.8-118.5)] and transferrin saturation [61.2% (31.5-90.9)] and listed for ferritin, soluble transferrin receptor, ferritin index, zinc protoporphyrin/heme ratio, reticulocyte hemoglobin content and hepcidin. These surrogate reference ranges were markedly different from adult values. Conclusion: Reference ranges of iron status parameters established for adults are probably not suitable to define iron status in preterm infants. If iron supplementation in preterm infants should be individually adjusted based on iron status parameters, it may be necessary to aim for cord blood concentration ranges to enable optimal growth and development. (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据