4.7 Article

Near electrical resonance signal enhancement (NERSE) in eddy-current crack detection

期刊

NDT & E INTERNATIONAL
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 82-89

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.04.009

关键词

Eddy-current; Electrical Resonance; Electromagnetic; NDT; NDE; Crack Detection

资金

  1. Rolls-Royce plc.
  2. Research Centre for Non-Destructive Evaluation (RCNDE)
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1102623] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An investigation was performed into the effects of operating an absolute eddy-current testing (ECT) probe at frequencies close to its electrical resonance. A previously undocumented defect signal enhancement phenomenon, resulting from associated shifts in electrical resonant frequency, was observed and characterized. Experimental validation was performed on three notch defects on a typical aerospace superalloy, Titanium 6Al-4V. A conventional absolute ECT probe was operated by sweeping through a frequency range about the electrical resonance of the system (1-5 MHz). The phenomenon results in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) peak enhancements by a factor of up to 3.7, at frequencies approaching resonance, compared to those measured at 1 MHz. The defect signal enhancement peaks are shown to be a result of resonant frequency shifts of the system due to the presence of defects within the material. A simple, operational approach for raising the sensitivity of conventional industrial eddy-current testing is proposed, based on the principles of the observed near electrical resonance signal enhancement (NERSE) phenomenon. The simple procedural change of operating within the NERSE frequency band does not require complex probe design, data analysis or, necessarily, identical coils. Therefore, it is a valuable technique for improving sensitivity, which complements other ECT methods. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据