4.5 Article

Role of Epac1 in mediating anti-proliferative effects of prostanoid EP2 receptors and cAMP in human lung fibroblasts

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00210-008-0334-3

关键词

Lung fibroblast; Epac; Prostanoid receptor; cAMP; Protein kinase A; Proliferation

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Ra-400/12-2]
  2. BONFOR Medical Faculty University of Bonn

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In lung fibroblasts, proliferation is inhibited by activation of EP2 prostanoid receptors which are known to couple to adenylyl cyclase. Beside the classic target of cAMP, protein kinase A (PKA), alternative cAMP effectors have been identified, among them Epac (exchange protein activated by cAMP). The present study aimed to illuminate transduction pathways mediating the anti-proliferative effects of EP2 receptors in lung fibroblasts. Proliferative activity of human lung fibroblasts was determined by measuring [3H]-thymidine incorporation. The selective EP2 receptor agonist butaprost inhibited 3H]-thymidine incorporation by 75%, an effect mimicked by forskolin, the phosphodiesterase inhibitor IBMX, the stable cAMP analogues dibutyryl-cAMP and bromo-cAMP, as well as by the Epac selective cAMP analogues 8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP and Sp-8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMPS, whereas the PKA selective agonist 6-Bnz-cAMP was inactive. The PKA inhibitor Rp-8-Br-cAMPS inhibited butaprost-induced phosphorylation of CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein), but did not affect butaprost-induced inhibition of [3H]-thymidine incorporation. Partial knockdown of Epac1 by specific siRNA transfection resulted in a marked attenuation of the inhibitory potency of butaprost, whereas transfection of Epac2 siRNA or non-silencing siRNA did not affect the effectiveness of butaprost to inhibit [3H]-thymidine incorporation. In conclusion, Epac1 rather than the classic cAMP effector PKA is a crucial element in the signal transduction pathway mediating anti-proliferative effects of EP2 receptor activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据