4.6 Article

Daytime sleepiness associated with poor sustained attention in middle and late adulthood

期刊

SLEEP MEDICINE
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 143-151

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.07.028

关键词

Psychomotor vigilance; Lapse; Sleep duration; Insomnia; Snoring; Sleep quality

资金

  1. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [2010-E71001-00, 2011-E71004-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We aimed to determine the association between psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) performance and sleep-related factors including sleep duration, daytime sleepiness, poor sleep quality, insomnia, and habitual snoring in a population-based sample. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis from the ongoing prospective cohort study, the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study. We measured PVT performance and documented demographics, sleep-related factors, life style, and medical conditions in community dwelling adults (N = 2499; mean age 57.1 +/- 7.3; male 1259). Associations between PVT parameters and sleep-related factors were tested, adjusting for age, gender, smoking, alcohol use, education, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, depression, and the interval between mid-sleep time and PVT test. Results: High Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS, >= 8) was associated with slower mean reciprocal response speed (mean RRT) (3.69 +/- 0.02 vs. 3.77 +/- 0.01, p < 0.001), higher probability for increased lapses (>= 4) (OR 1.48, CI 1.12-1.88, p = 0.001), and more negative RRT slope (-0.036 +/- 0.002 vs. -0.030 +/- 0.001, p = 0.02). Older age, female gender, low education level, depressive mood, and the interval between mid-sleep and PVT test were also associated with poor performance. Sleep duration, habitual snoring, insomnia, or poor sleep quality (the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score > 5) was not related to PVT parameters. Conclusions: At the population level, our results revealed important modifiers of PVT performance, which included subjective reports of daytime sleepiness. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据