4.8 Article

Classical shear cracks drive the onset of dry frictional motion

期刊

NATURE
卷 509, 期 7499, 页码 205-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature13202

关键词

-

资金

  1. James S. McDonnell Fund
  2. European Research Council [267256]
  3. Israel Science Foundation [76/11]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [267256] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Frictional processes entail the rupture(1,2) of the ensemble of discrete contacts defining a frictional interface(3,4). There are a variety of views on how best to describe the onset of dry frictional motion. These range from modelling friction with a single degree of freedom, a 'friction coefficient'(3,5), to theoretical treatments using dynamic fracture(5-8) to account for spatial and temporal dynamics along the interface. We investigated the onset of dry frictional motion by performing simultaneous high-speed measurements of the real contact area and the strain fields in the region surrounding propagating rupture tips within the dry (nominally flat) rough interfaces formed by brittle polymer blocks. Here we show that the transition from 'static' to 'dynamic' friction is quantitatively described by classical singular solutions for the motion of a rapid shear crack(5,9-13). We find that these singular solutions, originally derived to describe brittle fracture, are in excellent agreement with the experiments for slow propagation, whereas some significant discrepancies arise as the rupture velocity approaches the Rayleigh wave speed. In addition, the energy dissipated in the fracture of the contacts remains nearly constant throughout the entire range in which the rupture velocity is less than the Rayleigh wave speed, whereas the size of the dissipative zone undergoes a Lorentz-like contraction as the rupture velocity approaches the Rayleigh wave speed. This coupling between friction and fracture is critical to our fundamental understanding of frictional motion and related processes, such as earthquake dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据