4.6 Article

Inflammatory responses of RAW 264.7 macrophages upon exposure to nanoparticles: Role of ROS-NFκB signaling pathway

期刊

NANOTOXICOLOGY
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 502-516

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2010.541604

关键词

Nanoparticles; inflammation; ROS; NF-kappa B; cyclooxygenase-2

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Govt. of India
  2. Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development (AOARD), USA [FA4869-07-1-0017]
  3. Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India [IR/S5/IU-01/2006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advances in particle-forming chemistries used for developing nanotechnology has not only widened novel applications for nanoscale materials but also has provided significant concern regarding their biological effects. The present study investigates the inflammatory responses of RAW 264.7 mouse macrophages exposed to nanoparticles (NPs, 5 mu g/ml) of varied sizes including silver (Ag), aluminum (Al), carbon black (CB), carbon-coated silver (CAg) and gold (Au). A significant increase in IL-6, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, nuclear translocation of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B), induction of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) expression was observed in macrophages with maximum response found in cells exposed to Ag NPs followed by Al, CB and CAg. These pro-inflammatory effects of NPs were dependent on size and duration of exposure and comparable to those induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a known inflammatory mediator. Au NPs, on the other hand, induced small but significant inflammatory responses in macrophages upon prolonged exposure. These studies reveal that Ag NPs exhibit higher propensity in inducing inflammation, mediated by ROS and NF-kappa B signaling pathways and leading to the induction of COX-2, TNF-alpha and IL-6. However, no such prominent pro-inflammatory responses were observed with Au NPs, suggesting their bio-compatibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据