4.6 Article

Liver-specific microRNAs as biomarkers of nanomaterial-induced liver damage

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 24, 期 40, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/40/405102

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT)
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  3. Knowledge Cluster Initiative (MEXT)
  4. Health Labour Sciences Research Grants from Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan (MHLW)
  5. Global Environment Research Fund from Ministry of the Environment
  6. Food Safety Commission, Japan
  7. Cosmetology Research Foundation
  8. Smoking Research Foundation
  9. Research Foundation for Pharmaceutical Sciences
  10. Japan Food Chemical Research Foundation
  11. Takeda Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although nanomaterials are being used in various fields, their safety is not yet sufficiently understood. We have been attempting to establish a nanomaterials safety-assessment system by using biomarkers to predict nanomaterial-induced adverse biological effects. Here, we focused on microRNAs (miRNAs) because of their tissue-specific expression and high degree of stability in the blood. We previously showed that high intravenous doses of silica nanoparticles of 70 nm diameter (nSP70) induced liver damage in mice. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of serum levels of liver-specific or -enriched miRNAs (miR-122, miR-192, and miR-194) with that of conventional hepatic biomarkers (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)) as biomarkers for nSP70. After mice had been treated with nSP70, their serum miRNAs levels were measured by using quantitative RT-PCR. Serum levels of miR-122 in nSP70-treated mice were the highest among the three miRNAs. The sensitivity of miR-122 for liver damage was at least as good as those of ALT and AST. Like ALT and AST, miR-122 may be a useful biomarker of nSP70. We believe that these findings will help in the establishment of a nanomaterials safety-assessment system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据