4.7 Article

An electrochemical sensor for fast detection of wound infection based on myeloperoxidase activity

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 209, 期 -, 页码 265-274

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.11.125

关键词

Myeloperoxidase; Wound infection; Diagnosis; Sensor system; Amperometry; Biosensor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infection can lead to severe complications during wound healing. We have developed an electrochemical sensor for fast and simple detection of wound infection based on the quantification of myeloperoxidase activity as a marker for infection. Applicability of the enzyme was confirmed with a correlation study with silver standard wound diagnostics. Significant higher enzyme activities comparing non infected and infected wound fluids were determined (P = 0.01). To eliminate supplemental substrate addition, the chlorination activity of the enzyme - the formation of hypochlorous acid (HOCl) from chloride and hydrogen peroxide - was investigated in different wound fluids and correlated with the peroxidation activity measurements. Significant activity differences were likewise obtained (P = 0.01). Based on this we constructed an electrochemical hydrogen peroxide sensor system for the quantification of chlorination activity in wound fluids. Furthermore, immobilized glucose oxidase was integrated into the system to provide hydrogen peroxide required by myeloperoxidase. Infected wound fluids were indeed identified by using the sensor system quantifying the consumption of hydrogen peroxide consumed by myeloperoxidase. Thereby, immobilized glucose oxidase was shown to produce enough hydrogen peroxide for the myeloperoxidase reaction from glucose present in wound fluids. There is a strong need for a simple but effective sensor system to determine infections in wounds. This sensor measuring hydrogen peroxide consumption could effectively identify infected wound fluids based on the myeloperoxidase activity. (C) 2014 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据