4.8 Article

Visualization of the Magnetic Structure of Sculpted Three-Dimensional Cobalt Nanospirals

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 759-764

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl404071u

关键词

Nanomagnetic structure; nanospiral; 3D nanomagnetism; 3D visualization; Lorentz transmission electron microscopy

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  3. MRSEC [DMR-0820521]
  4. CAREER [ECCS-0846329]
  5. RII [EPS-1004094]
  6. Multi-disciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) [AFOSR FA9550-12-0458]
  7. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  8. Directorate For Engineering [0846329] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. EPSCoR [1004094] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Office Of The Director [1004094] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we report on the direct visualization of magnetic structure in sculpted three-dimensional cobalt (Co) nanospirals with a wire diameter of 20 nm and outer spiral diameter of 115 nm and on the magnetic interactions between the nanospirals, using aberration-corrected Lorentz transmission electron microscopy. By analyzing the magnetic domains in three dimensions at the nanoscale, we show that magnetic domain formation in the Co nanospirals is a result of the shape anisotropy dominating over the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of the system. We also show that the strong dipolar magnetic interactions between adjacent closely packed nanospirals leads to their magnetization directions adopting alternating directions to minimize the total magnetostatic energy of the system. Deviations from such magnetization structure can only be explained by analyzing the complex three-dimensional structure of the nanospirals. These nanostructures possess an inherent chirality due to their growth conditions and are of significant importance as nanoscale building blocks in magneto-optical devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据