4.5 Article

Current issues in the clinical management of invasive candida infections - the AGIHO, DMykG, OGMM and PEG web-based survey and expert consensus conference 2009

期刊

MYCOSES
卷 54, 期 5, 页码 E546-E556

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2010.01988.x

关键词

Candida spp; antifungal agents; systemic infection; yeast

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF) [01KN0706, 01KI0771]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [RU 1578/1-1]
  3. Astellas Pharma
  4. Bayer
  5. Basilea
  6. Genzyme
  7. Gilead Sciences
  8. Pfizer
  9. Merck
  10. Optimer
  11. Schering-Plough
  12. Vicuron
  13. MSD Sharp+Dohme
  14. Deutscher Stifterverband fur die Deutsche Wissenschaft

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objectives of this study were to identify unsolved issues in the management of invasive candidiasis, identify controversies and achieve consensus. The German Speaking Mycological Society (Deutschsprachige Mykologische Gesellschaft, DMykG e.V.) asked other German infectious diseases (ID) and mycological societies to submit unsolved issues concerning the diagnosis and treatment of fungal infections. Based on these contributions, a digital web-based questionnaire of 12 questions on Candida infections was designed to be completed by experts of the participating societies. Controversial results were identified by a mathematical model and were discussed at a consensus conference during the 43rd Annual Meeting of the DMykG e.V. in Cologne, Germany. Forty-two individuals completed the questionnaire. Analysis showed a strong consensus on treatment indications, choice of antifungals for clinical situations, handling of central venous catheters, duration of treatment and role of susceptibility testing. Opinions diverged on: initial treatment of haemodynamically stable neutropenic and haemodynamically unstable non-neutropenic patients, step down to oral treatment and the differential role of the echinocandins. These questions were presented for discussion at the expert consensus conference. In three of four questions, consensus was achieved. A two-step approach - web-based survey plus classical panel discussion - allows to capture expeditiously the opinions of a large and diverse group of individuals, to identify controversial issues and to resolve them in a personal, interactive setting. Thus, expert consensus was achieved on nine of 12 important questions on how to treat invasive candidiasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据