4.1 Article

Species conserved DNA damage response at the inactive human X chromosome

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.04.006

关键词

DNA damage response; Particle irradiation; Heterochromatin; Chromocenter; Inactive X chromosome

资金

  1. BMBF [02NUK001A, 02S8355]
  2. Helmholtz graduate school for hadron and ion research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chromatin modifications are long known as an essential part of the orchestrated response resulting in the repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Only recently, however, the influence of the chromatin architecture itself on the DNA damage response has been recognised. Thus for heterochromatic DSBs the sensing and early recruitment of repair factors to the lesion occurs within the heterochromatic compartments, but the damage sites are subsequently relocated from the inside to the outside of the heterochromatin. While previous studies were accomplished at the constitutive heterochromatin of centromeric regions in mouse and flies, here we examine the DSB repair at the facultative heterochromatin of the inactive X chromosome (Xi) in humans. Using heavy ion irradiation we show that at later times after irradiation the DSB damage streaks bend around the Xi verifying that the relocation process is conserved between species and not specialised to repetitive sequences only. In addition, to measure chromatin relaxation at rare positions within the genome, we established live cell microscopy at the GSI microbeam thus allowing the aimed irradiation of small nuclear structures like the Xi. Chromatin decondensation at DSBs within the Xi is clearly visible within minutes as a continuous decrease of the DNA staining overtime, comparable to the DNA relaxation revealed at DSBs in mouse chromocenters. Furthermore, despite being conserved between species, slight differences in the underlying regulation of these processes in heterochromatic DSBs are apparent. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据