4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Relationship between chromatin structure, DNA damage and repair following X-irradiation of human lymphocytes

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.03.005

关键词

FISH-Comet assay; DNA repair; Heterochromatin; CpG islands; DMSO; Radical scavengers; Exchange aberrations and chromatin architecture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Earlier studies using the technique of premature chromosome condensation (PCC) have shown that in human lymphocytes, exchange type of aberrations are formed immediately following low doses (<2 Gy) of X-rays, whereas at higher doses these aberrations increase with the duration of recovery. This reflects the relative roles of slow and fast repair in the formation of exchange aberrations. The underlying basis for slow and fast repairing components of the DNA repair may be related to differential localization of the initial damage in the genome, i.e., between relaxed and condensed chromatin. We have tried to gain some insight into this problem by (a) X-irradiating lymphocytes in the presence of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) a potent scavenger of radiation-induced (center dot)OH radicals followed by PCC and (b) probing the damage and repair in two specific chromosomes, 18 and 19, which are relatively poor and rich in transcribing genes by COMET-FISH, a combination of Comet assay and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques. Results obtained show (a) that both fast appearing and slowly formed exchange aberrations seem to take place in relaxed chromatin, since they are affected to a similar extent by DMSO, (b) significant differential DNA breakage of chromosome 18 compared to chromosome 19 in both GO and G1 phases of the cell cycle as detected by Comet assay, indicating that relaxed chromatin containing high densities of transcriptionally active genes shows less fragmentation due to fast repair (chromosome 19) compared to chromosome 18, and (c) that relaxed chromatin is repaired or mis-repaired faster than more compact chromatin. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据