4.3 Article

EDSS variability before randomization may limit treatment discovery in primary progressive MS

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 19, 期 6, 页码 775-781

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458512459685

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; EDSS; rituximab; disability progression; PPMS

资金

  1. F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
  2. Biogen Idec.
  3. Roche
  4. Teva Neuroscience
  5. Sanofi-Aventis
  6. Cleveland Clinic
  7. Daichi-Sankyo
  8. GlaxoSmithKlein Pharmaceuticals
  9. Genmab Biopharmaceuticals
  10. Eli Lilly
  11. Medivation
  12. Modigenetech
  13. Ono Pharmaceuticals
  14. PTC Therapeutics
  15. Teva
  16. Vivus
  17. University of Pennsylvania
  18. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  19. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
  20. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (NMSS)
  21. Alexion
  22. Bayhill
  23. Bayer
  24. Novartis
  25. Consortium of MS Centers
  26. Genzyme
  27. Klein-Buendel Incorporated
  28. Nuron Biotech
  29. Peptimmune
  30. Somnus Pharmaceuticals
  31. Sandoz
  32. Teva Pharmaceuticals
  33. UT Southwestern
  34. Visioneering Technologies Inc.
  35. National Institutes of Health
  36. Clayton Foundation for Research
  37. National Multiple Sclerosis Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is usually based on a single measurement. Here we evaluated whether using a baseline EDSS derived from two pre-treatment measurements improves the detection of progression events and the ability to demonstrate a therapeutic effect in delaying MS disability progression. Methods: Real data from OLYMPUS, a phase II/III randomized, placebo-controlled trial of rituximab in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS), as well as simulated data were analyzed. Several definitions of baseline EDSS were used to capture sustained disability progression (SDP) events. Variations in the EDSS were estimated by linear mixed-effect models. Results: Selecting the higher of two baseline EDSS scores lowered the number of SDP events in both treatment groups, so decreasing sensitivity, and reduced the number of false SDP events, so increasing specificity. Conversely, selecting the lower of two baseline scores increased sensitivity but decreased specificity. Increased power (similar to 7% based on the simulation study) was observed when the average of screening and Week 0 EDSS scores was used for baseline. Conclusion: Baseline EDSS derived from two pre-treatment EDSS measurements may enhance the ability of detecting a therapeutic effect in slowing disability progression in PPMS. This strategy could be implemented in future clinical trials of patients with MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据