4.6 Article

Regional Alterations of Brain Microstructure in Parkinson's Disease Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging

期刊

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 90-97

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.23917

关键词

diffusion tensor imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; Parkinson's disease; subtypes

资金

  1. Michael J. Fox Foundation [MJJF-BM2007]
  2. NIH/NIRR Research Resource for MRI of Neurodegenerative Disorders [1 P41RR023953]
  3. Larry L. Hillblom Foundation [2008-A-020-FEL]
  4. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P41RR023953] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [K23AG037566] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study tested the hypothesis that diffusion tensor imaging can detect alteration in microscopic integrity of white matter and basal ganglia regions known to be involved in Parkinson's disease (PD) pathology. It was also hypothesized that there is an association between diffusion abnormality and PD severity and subtype. Diffusion tensor imaging at 4 Tesla was obtained in 12 PD and 20 control subjects, and measures of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity were evaluated using both region-of-interest and voxel-based methods. Movement deficits and subtypes in PD subjects were assessed using the Motor Subscale (Part III) of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. Reduced fractional anisotropy (P < .05, corrected) was found in PD subjects in regions related to the precentral gyrus, substantia nigra, putamen, posterior striatum, frontal lobe, and the supplementary motor areas. Reduced fractional anisotropy in the substantia nigra correlated (P < .05, corrected) with the increased rating scale motor scores. Significant spatial correlations between fractional anisotropy alterations in the putamen and other PD-affected regions were also found in the context of PD subtypes index analysis. Our data suggest that microstructural alterations detected with diffusion tensor might serve as a potential biomarker for PD. (C) 2011 Movement Disorder Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据