4.6 Article

Cerebrospinal Tau, Phospho-Tau, and Beta-Amyloid and Neuropsychological Functions in Parkinson's Disease

期刊

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
卷 24, 期 15, 页码 2203-2210

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.22594

关键词

Parkinson's disease; dementia; cerebrospinal fluid; tau; beta-amyloid; neuropsychological function

资金

  1. Fundacio la Marato de TV3 2006 [N-2006-TV060510]
  2. Spanish Neurology Society (SEN)
  3. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science [AP2005-0191]
  4. Anesthesiology Service
  5. Knee Surgery Unit
  6. Movement Disorders Unit research nurse
  7. Laboratory of Experimental Neurology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD)-pathology may play a role in Parkinson's disease (PD)-related dementia (PDD). The aim of this study was to assess cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of tau, phospho-tau, and beta-amyloid, proposed AD biomarkers, and their relationship with cognitive function in PD. Forty PD patients [20 nondemented (PDND); 20 PDD] and 30 controls underwent CSF tau, phospho-tau, and beta-amyloid analysis using specific ELISA techniques. All PD patients and 15 controls underwent neuropsychological testing of fronto-subcortical (attention, fluency) and neocortical (memory, naming, visuoperceptive) functions. CSF markers levels were compared between groups, and compared and correlated with neuropsychological measures in PDND and PDD separately and as a continuum (PD). CSF tau and phospho-tau were higher in PDD than in PDND and controls (P < 0.05). CSF beta-amyloid ranged from high (controls) to intermediate (PDND) and low (PDD) levels (P < 0.001). In all PD and PDD patients, high CSF tau and phospho-tau were associated with impaired memory and naming. In PDND, CSF beta-amyloid was related with phonetic fluency. These findings suggest underlying AD-pathology in PDD in association with cortical cognitive dysfunction, and that low CSF beta-amyloid in PDND patients with impaired phonetic fluency call constitute ail early marker of cognitive dysfunction. (C) 2009 Movement Disorder Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据