4.6 Article

GCH1 in Early-Onset Parkinson's Disease

期刊

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
卷 24, 期 14, 页码 2070-2075

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.22729

关键词

GCH1; Parkinson's disease; dopa-responsive dystonia; DRD; PRKN; early-onset Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [PBLAB-115478]
  2. Swiss Parkinson Foundation
  3. Simpson Foundation Trust
  4. Morris K. Udall Center of Excellence for Parkinson's disease Research [P50-NS40256]
  5. Pacific Alzheimer Research Foundation (PARF) [C06-01]
  6. NINDS [NS26081]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in GTP-cyclohydrolase 1 (GCH1) cause autosomal dominant dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD), characterized by childhood-onset foot dystonia that later generalizes. DRD patients frequently present with associated Parkinsonism. Conversely, early-onset Parkinson's disease (EOPD) patients commonly display dystonia. Herein, we investigated the frequency of GCH1 mutations in a series of 53 familial EOPD patients (21 with dystonia) and screened them for Mutations in PRKN, PINK1, and DJ-1. In addition, we examined a matched EOPD patient-control series for association of common variability at the GCH1 locus and EOPD susceptibility. No GCH1 coding change or copy-number abnormality was identified in familial EOPD patients. A novel 18-bp deletion was found in the proximal promoter (two patients, one control), which is expected to knock out two regulatory elements previously shown to regulate GCH1 transcription. No association was found between GCH1 variability and risk of EOPD. Fourteen (26.4%) familial EOPD patients had homozygous or compound heterozygous PRKN mutations. PRKN-positive patients were 10 years younger than PRKN-negative patients and had a twofold higher prevalence of dystonia. This study does not support a significant role for genetic variation at the GCH1 locus in EOPD. However, our results further highlight the relevance of PRKN screening in familial EOPD. (C) 2009 Movement Disorder Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据