4.4 Article

Genesis of the Goshen County, Wyoming, Tornado on 5 June 2009 during VORTEX2

期刊

MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
卷 141, 期 4, 页码 1157-1181

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-12-00056.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [AGS-0801041, AGS-1211132, AGS-0801035, AGS-1157646, AGS-0724318, AGS-0734001]
  2. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [0801041, 0801035] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genesis of a strong and long-lived tornado observed during the second Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment (VORTEX2) in Goshen County, Wyoming, on 5 June 2009 is studied. Mobile radar, mobile mesonet, rawinsonde, and photographic data are used to produce an integrated analysis of the evolution of the wind, precipitation, and thermodynamic fields in the parent supercell to deduce the processes that resulted in tornadogenesis. Several minutes prior to tornadogenesis, the rear-flank downdraft intensifies, and a secondary rear-flank downdraft forms and cyclonically wraps around the developing tornado. Kinematic and thermodynamic analyses suggest that horizontal vorticity created in the forward flank and hook echo is tilted and then stretched near the developing tornado. Tilting and stretching are enhanced in the developing low-level circulation as the secondary rear-flank downdraft develops, intensifies, and wraps around the circulation center. Shortly thereafter, the tornado forms. Tornadogenesis does not proceed steadily. Strengthening, weakening, and renewed intensification of the tornado are documented in photographic, reflectivity, Doppler velocity, and dual-Doppler fields and are associated with, and shortly follow, changes in the secondary rear-flank downdraft, convergence, location of the vortex relative to the updraft/downdraft couplet, tilting and stretching near and in the developing tornado, and the evolution of total circulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据