4.7 Article

On the orbits of low-mass companions to white dwarfs and the fates of the known exoplanets

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt569

关键词

stars: AGB and post-AGB; binaries: close; stars: late-type; stars: low-mass; white dwarfs

资金

  1. NSF AAP Fellowship [AST-1102738]
  2. NASA HST [AR-12146.04-A]
  3. NSF [AST-0807444]
  4. Keck Fellowship
  5. Friends of the Institute
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1102738] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ultimate fates of binary companions to stars (including whether the companion survives and the final orbit of the binary) are of interest in light of an increasing number of recently discovered, low-mass companions to white dwarfs (WDs). In this Letter, we study the evolution of a two-body system wherein the orbit adjusts due to structural changes in the primary, dissipation of orbital energy via tides, and mass-loss during the giant phases; previous studies have not incorporated changes in the primary's spin. For companions ranging from Jupiter's mass to similar to 0.3 M-circle dot and primaries ranging from 1 to 3 M-circle dot, we determine the minimum initial semimajor axis required for the companion to avoid engulfment by the primary during post-main-sequence evolution, and highlight the implications for the ultimate survival of the known exoplanets. We present regions in secondary mass and orbital period space where an engulfed companion might be expected to survive the common envelope phase (CEP), and compare with known M dwarf+WD short-period binaries. Finally, we note that engulfed Earth-like planets cannot survive a CEP. Detection of a first-generation terrestrial planet in the WD habitable zone requires scattering from a several au orbit to a high-eccentricity orbit (with a periastron of similar to R-circle dot) from which it is damped into a circular orbit via tidal friction, possibly rendering it an uninhabitable, charred ember.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据