4.7 Article

Cyanide/isocyanide abundances in the interstellar medium - II. Inelastic rate coefficients of Al and Mg compounds

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt481

关键词

molecular data; molecular processes; scattering

资金

  1. CNRS
  2. french embassy of Cuba
  3. US National Science Foundation [CHE-1213332]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modelling molecular abundances in the interstellar medium (ISM) requires accurate molecular data. Then, accurate determination of collisional rate coefficients is an essential step in order to estimate the cyanide/isocyanide abundances in interstellar clouds. In addition, cyanides/isocyanides are the most common metal-containing molecules in circumstellar gas. In this work, we have carried out calculations of rate coefficients for the rotational excitation of aluminium cyanide (AlCN), aluminium isocyanide (AlNC), magnesium cyanide (MgCN) and magnesium isocyanide (MgNC) molecules in collision with He. The calculations are based on new two-dimensional potential energy surfaces obtained from highly correlated ab initio calculations. Coupled states quantum approximation was used to obtain pure rotational (de-)excitation cross-sections of AlCN, AlNC, MgCN and MgNC by He. The fine structure splitting of MgCN and MgNC was taken into account through a technique based on infinite-order sudden scaling relationship. Rate coefficients for transitions among the first 26 rotational levels of AlCN and AlNC and among the first 41 fine structure levels of MgCN and MgNC were calculated for the temperature range between 5 and 100 K. Significant differences between the rate coefficients of both isomers were observed. These differences confirm that specific calculations have to be performed for each isomer in order to obtain the necessary level of detail. The new rate coefficients should induce important consequences on the determination of metal abundance in the ISM. In particular, our work confirms that the AlCN molecule is significantly less abundant than AlNC in the ISM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据