4.4 Review

Low-dose pulse cyclophosphamide in interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD): Efficacy of maintenance immunosuppression in responders and non-responders

期刊

SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 437-444

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.09.003

关键词

Systemic sclerosis; Interstitial lung disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the long-term disease course of patients with recently deteriorated systemic sclerosis (SSC)-interstitial lung disease (ILD) undergoing continuous immunosuppressive treatment with cyclophosphamide (CYC) as induction therapy. Methods: A total of 45 consecutive SSc patients were treated with weekly pulses of 500 mg of CYC up to 10-g cumulative dose followed by azathioprine (AZA) in those experiencing improvement (>10% increase) or stabilization of both forced vital capacity and diffusion lung capacity for carbon dioxide and by micophenolic acid (MMF) in those experiencing deterioration (>10% decrease of either parameter). The follow-up ranged from 6 to 62 months post-CYC regimen (median = 36 months). Results: Overall, 39 patients completed the CYC regimen. Of them, 24 (61.5%) experienced improvement or stabilization of lung function parameters and received AZA; the remaining 15 received MMF. During follow-up, lung function parameters improved in 3 (12.5%), remained stable in 18 (75%), and worsened in 3 (12.5%) AZA-treated patients, whereas they worsened in 8 (67%) and remained stable in 4 (33%) MMF-treated patients. The incidence of improvement or stabilization was significantly higher in AZA-treated than in MMF-treated patients (p = 0.001). The time to the decline of lung function was significantly shorter in CYC non-responders, and CYC unresponsiveness was predictive of lung function worsening over time in a multivariate analysis (HR = 9.14; 95% CI: 2.28-36.64; p = 0.0018). Conclusion: Our study supports the use of low-dose pulse CYC as induction therapy of recently deteriorated SSc-ILD. Moreover, it suggests that AZA should be administered to CYC-responsive patients but does not show any definite effect of MMF in unresponsive patients. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据