4.7 Article

The other side of bulge formation in a Λ cold dark matter cosmology: bulgeless galaxies in the local Universe

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19047.x

关键词

galaxies: bulges; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: interactions; galaxies: structure

资金

  1. INAF-OATs
  2. European Research Council under the European Community [202781]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the physical properties, formation histories and environment of galaxies without a significant ` classical' spheroidal component, as predicted by semi-analytical models of galaxy formation and evolution. This work is complementary to the analysis presented in De Lucia et al., where we focus on the relative contribution of various physical mechanisms responsible for bulge assembly in a Lambda cold dark matter cosmology. We find that the fraction of bulgeless galaxies is a strong decreasing function of stellar mass: they represent a negligible fraction of the galaxy population with M-star > 10(12) M-circle dot, but dominate at M-star < 10(10) M-circle dot. We find a clear dichotomy in this galaxy population, between central galaxies of low-mass dark matter haloes and satellite galaxies in massive groups/clusters. We show that bulgeless galaxies are relatively young systems, that assemble most of their mass at low redshift, but they can also host very old stellar populations. Since galaxy-galaxy mergers are assumed to lead to the formation of a spheroidal component, in our models these galaxies form preferentially in low-mass haloes that host a small number of satellites galaxies. We show that the adopted modelling for galaxy mergers represents a key ingredient in determining the actual number of bulgeless galaxies. Our results show that these galaxies are not a rare population in theoretical models: at z similar to 0, galaxies with no classical bulge (but often including galaxies with the equivalent of pseudo-bulges) account for up to 14 per cent of the galaxies with 10(11) < M-star/M-circle dot < 10(12).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据