4.6 Article

ROS-Dependent Antiproliferative Effect of Brassinin Derivative Homobrassinin in Human Colorectal Cancer Caco2 Cells

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 10877-10897

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules190810877

关键词

indole phytoalexins; homobrassinin; antiproliferative; apoptosis; ROS

资金

  1. project Medicinsky univerzitny park v Kosiciach (MediPark, Kosice) [ITMS: 26220220185]
  2. Slovak Grant Agency for Science [1/0322/14]
  3. Operational Programme Research and Development [OP VaV-2012/2.2/08-RO, OPVaV/12/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was designed to examine the in vitro antiproliferative effect of brassinin and its derivatives on human cancer cell lines. Among seven tested compounds, homobrassinin (K1; N-[2-(indol-3-yl) ethyl]-S-methyldithiocarbamate) exhibited the most potent activity with IC50 = 8.0 mu M in human colorectal Caco2 cells and was selected for further studies. The flow cytometric analysis revealed a K1-induced increase in the G(2)/M phase associated with dysregulation of alpha-tubulin, alpha(1)-tubulin and beta(5)-tubulin expression. These findings suggest that the inhibitory effect of K1 can be mediated via inhibition of microtubule formation. Furthermore, simultaneously with G(2)/M arrest, K1 also increased population of cells with sub-G(1) DNA content which is considered to be a marker of apoptotic cell death. Apoptosis was also confirmed by annexin V/PI double staining, DNA fragmentation assay and chromatin condensation assay. The apoptosis was associated with the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), caspase-3 activation as well as intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Moreover, the antioxidant Trolox blocked ROS production, changes in MMP and decreased K1 cytotoxicity, which confirmed the important role of ROS in cell apoptosis. Taken together, our data demonstrate that K1 induces ROS-dependent apoptosis in Caco2 cells and provide the rationale for further in vivo anticancer investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据