4.7 Article

Development of a Hybrid Baculoviral Vector for Sustained Transgene Expression

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 658-666

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2009.13

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Tsing Hua University [97N2511E1]
  2. National Science Council [NSC 972627-B-007-014, NSC 97-2622-E-007-009-CC3]
  3. Tsou's Foundation [VGHUST97-P5-15]
  4. CGMH-NTHU [96N2425E1]
  5. National Health Research Institutes [NHRI-EX97-9412EI]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Baculovirus is a promising gene delivery vector but its widespread application is impeded as it only mediates transient transgene expression in mammalian cells. To prolong the expression, we developed a dual baculovirus system whereby one baculovirus expressed FLP recombinase while the other harbored an Frt-flanking cassette encompassing the transgene and oriP/EBNA1 derived from Epstein-Barr virus. After cotransduction of cells, the expressed FLP cleaved the Frt-flanking cassette off the baculovirus genome and catalyzed circular episome formation, then oriP/EBNA1 within the cassette enabled the self-replication of episomes. The excision/recombination efficiency was remarkably enhanced by sodium butyrate, reaching 75% in human embryonic kidney-293 (HEK293) cells, 85% in baby-hamster kidney (BHK) cells, 77% in primary chondrocytes, and 48% in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The hybrid baculovirus substantially prolonged the transgene expression to approximate to 48 days without selection and >63 days with selection, thanks to the maintenance of replicons and transgene transcription. In contrast to the replicating episomes, the baculovirus genome was rapidly degraded. Furthermore, an osteoinductive growth factor gene was efficiently delivered into MSCs using this system, which not only prolonged the growth factor expression but also potentiated the osteogenesis of MSCs. These data collectively implicate the potential of this hybrid baculovirus system in gene therapy applications necessitating sustained transgene expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据