4.5 Article

Evidence for Functional Diversification Within a Fungal NEP1-Like Protein Family

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 278-286

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-09-12-0222-R

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Council for Earth and Life sciences of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
  2. Centre for BioSystems Genomics, Netherlands Genomics Initiative/Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we functionally analyzed the gene family encoding necrosis- and ethylene-inducing-like proteins (NLP) of the vascular wilt pathogen Verticillium dahliae. We show that the composition of the NLP gene family varies little among V dahliae isolates. The cytotoxic activity of NLP family members of a tomato-pathogenic V dahliae strain was determined, demonstrating that only two of the seven NLP induced plant cell death. The genes encoding these cytotoxic NLP were found to be induced in V dahliae upon colonization of tomato. Interestingly, targeted deletion of either of the two genes in V dahliae significantly compromised virulence on tomato as well as on Arabidopsis plants, whereas deletion of only one of the two genes affected virulence on Nicotiana benthamiana. This could be attributed to differential induction of the two NLP genes in V dahliae upon N. benthamiana colonization, revealing that the in planta induction of NLP genes varies between plant hosts. Intriguingly, one of the NLP genes appears to also affect vegetative growth and conidiospore production, because the corresponding deletion strain produced significantly fewer conidiospores and developed extensive aerial mycelium. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the expanded V dahliae NLP family shows functional diversification, revealing not only differential cytotoxicity between family members but also that the cytotoxic NLP play a role in vegetative growth and asexual reproduction in addition to their contribution to virulence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据