4.5 Article

Tobacco MAP Kinase Phosphatase (NtMKP1) Negatively Regulates Wound Response and Induced Resistance Against Necrotrophic Pathogens and Lepidopteran Herbivores

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 668-675

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-11-12-0272-R

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japanese Program for the Promotion of Basic and Applied Researches for Innovation in Bio-oriented Industry (BRAIN)
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23380027, 23658061, 23688005] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades are universal signal transduction pathways in eukaryotic cells. In tobacco, two MAPK, wound-induced protein kinase (WIPK) and salicylic acid (SA)-induced protein kinase (SIPK), are activated by biotic and abiotic stresses. Both WIPK and SIPK positively regulate the biosynthesis of jasmonic acid (JA) or ethylene (ET) while negatively regulating SA accumulation. We showed previously that recombinant tobacco MAPK phosphatase (NtMKP1) protein de-phosphorylates and inactivates SIPK in vitro, and overexpression of NtMKP1 repressed wound-induced activation of both SIPK and WIPK. To elucidate the role of NtMKP1 in response to biotic and abiotic stresses, we generated transgenic tobacco plants in which NtMKP1 expression was suppressed. Suppression of NtMKP1 expression resulted in enhanced activation of WIPK and SIPK and production of both JA and ET upon wounding. Wound-induced expression of JA- or ET-inducible genes, basic PR-1 and PI-II, was also significantly enhanced in these plants. Furthermore, NtMKP/-suppressed plants exhibited enhanced resistance against a necrotrophic pathogen, Botrytis cinerea, and lepidopteran herbivores, Mamestra brassicae and Spodoptera litura. These results suggest that NtMKP1 negatively regulates wound response and resistance against both necrotrophic pathogens and herbivorous insects through suppression of JA or ET pathways via inactivation of MAPK.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据