4.7 Article

Evaluating phylogenetic informativeness and data-type usage for new protein-coding genes across Vertebrata

期刊

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 61, 期 2, 页码 300-307

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.06.016

关键词

EST; cDNA; Marker development; Tetrapoda; Amniota; Amphibia; Mammalia; Reptilia; Aves; Theria hypothesis; Marsupionta hypothesis

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [08-564]
  2. Museum of Vertebrate Zoology
  3. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [0905714] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a resource for vertebrate phylogenetics, we developed 75 new protein-coding genes using a combination of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) available in Genbank, and targeted amplification of complementary DNA (cDNA). In addition, we performed three additional analyses in order to assess the utility of our approach. First, we profiled the phylogenetic informativeness of these new markers using the online program PhyDesign. Next, we compared the utility of four different data-types used in phylogenetics: nucleotides (NUCL), amino acids (AA), 1st and 2nd codon positions only (N12), and modified sequences to account for codon degeneracy (DEGEN1; Regier et al., 2010). Lastly, we use these new markers to construct a vertebrate phylogeny and address the uncertain relationship between higher-level mammal groups: monotremes, marsupials, and placentals. Our results show that phylogenetic informativeness of the 75 new markers varies, both in the amount of phylogenetic signal and optimal timescale. When comparing the four data-types, we find that the NUCL data-type, due to the high level of phylogenetic signal, performs the best across all divergence times. The remaining three data-types (AA, N12, DEGEN1) are less subject to homoplasy, but have greatly reduced levels of phylogenetic signal relative to NUCL Our phylogenetic inference supports the Theria hypothesis of mammalian relationships, with marsupials and placentals being sister groups. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据