4.7 Article

Hidden generic diversity in Neotropical birds: Molecular and anatomical data support a new genus for the Scytalopus indigoticus species-group (Aves: Rhinocryptidae)

期刊

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 125-135

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.06.017

关键词

Rhinocryptidae; Scytalopus; New genus; Systematics; Paraphyly; South America

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [141149/20060]
  2. CNPq
  3. Chapman Memorial Fund of the AMNH and Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de los Andes
  4. SAVE Brasil/BirdLife International and the Fundacao O Boticario de Protecao a Natureza

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genus Scytalopus is a species-rich and taxonomically complicated component of the Neotropical avian family Rhinocryptidae. Probably because Scytalopus is a superficially uniform assemblage, its monophyly has not been seriously questioned. We investigated phylogenetic relationships of a representative set of species in the genus using nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences as well as anatomical data, and provided the first test of its presumed monophyly by including in the analyses its hypothesized closest relatives (the genera Myornis, Eugralla, and Merulaxis) as well as most rhinocryptid genera. We found strong support for the paraphyly of the genus Scytalopus, with the Scytalopus indigoticus species-group forming a clade with Merulaxis. A well-supported clade including the genera Eugralla, Myornis, and the remaining Scytalopus was also recovered. Because these results were recovered independently and with strong support using mitochondrial and nuclear data, and were entirely consistent with anatomical data, we erect a new genus for the S. indigoticus species-group. These findings illustrate the importance of formally testing hypotheses of monophyly even for well-accepted groups of Neotropical birds. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据