4.7 Article

Identification of Nephrotoxic Compounds with Embryonic Stem-Cell-Derived Human Renal Proximal Tubular-Like Cells

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 1982-1990

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/mp400637s

关键词

stem cell; renal proximal tubular cell; embryonic stem-cell-derived human renal cell; drug-induced kidney injury; nephrotoxicity; predictive in vitro model; interleukins

资金

  1. Joint Council Office (Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR)) Development Program
  2. Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (Biomedical Research Council, A*STAR, Singapore)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The kidney is a major target for drug-induced toxicity, and the renal proximal tubule is frequently affected. Nephrotoxicity is typically detected only late during drug development, and the nephrotoxic potential of newly approved drugs is often underestimated. A central problem is the lack of preclinical models with high predictivity. Validated in vitro models for the prediction of nephrotoxicity are not available. Major problems are related to the identification of appropriate cell models and end points. As drug-induced kidney injury is associated with inflammatory reactions, we explored the expression of inflammatory markers as end point for renal in vitro models. In parallel, we developed a new cell model. Here, we combined these approaches and developed an in vitro model with embryonic stem-cell-derived human renal proximal tubular-like cells that uses the expression of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 as end points. The predictivity of the model was evaluated with 41 well-characterized compounds. The results revealed that the model predicts proximal tubular toxicity in humans with high accuracy. In contrast, the predictivity was low when well-established standard in vitro assays were used. Together, the results show that high predictivity can be obtained with in vitro models employing pluripotent stein cell-derived human renal proximal tubular-like cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据