4.7 Article

Lapatinib and 17AAG Reduce 89Zr-Trastuzumab-F(ab')2 Uptake in SKBR3 Tumor Xenografts

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 2995-3002

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/mp3002182

关键词

HER2; PET; lapatinib; 17AAG; HSP90

资金

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [2007-3739]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) directed therapy potentially can be improved by insight in drug effects on HER2 expression. This study evaluates the effects of the EGFR/HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib, the heat shock protein-90 inhibitor 17AAG, and their combination, on HER2 expression with in vivo HER2-PET imaging. Lapatinib and 17AAG effects on EGFR and HER2 membrane expression were determined in vitro using flow cytometry of human SKBR3 tumor cells. Effect of lapatinib on HER2 internalization was studied in vitro by Zr-89-trastuzumab-F(ab')(2) internalization. For in vivo evaluation, Zr-89-trastuzurnab-F(ab')(2) mu PET imaging was performed two times with a 7 day interval. Lapatinib was administered for 6 days, starting 1 day after the baseline scan. 17AAG was given 1 day before the second Zr-89-trastuzumab-F(ab')(2) injection. Imaging data were compared with ex vivo biodistribution analysis and HER2 immunohistochemical staining. 17AAG treatment lowered EGFR expression by 41% (P = 0.016) and HER2 by 76% (P = 0.022). EGFR/HER2 downregulation by 17AAG was inhibited by lapatinib pretreatment. Lapatinib reduced internalization of Zr-89-trastuzumab-F(ab')(2) with 25% (P = 0.0022). Zr-89-trastuzumab-F(ab')(2) tumor to blood ratio was lowered 32% by lapatinib (P = 0.00004), 34% by 17AAG (P = 0.0022) and even 53% by the combination (P = 0.011). Lapatinib inhibits HER2 internalization and 17AAG lowers HER2 membrane expression. Both drugs reduce Zr-89-trastuzumab-F(ab')(2) tumor uptake. Based on our findings, supported by previous preclinical data indicating the antitumor potency of lapatinib in combination with HSP90 inhibition, combination of these drugs deserves further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据