4.6 Article

Evaluation of the global association between cholesterol-associated polymorphisms and Alzheimer's disease suggests a role for rs3846662 and HMGCR splicing in disease risk

期刊

MOLECULAR NEURODEGENERATION
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1750-1326-6-62

关键词

Alzheimer; genetics; cholesterol; GWAS; SNP; HMGCR; statin

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Institute on Aging [P01-AG030128, RO1-AG18023, T32-AG000242]
  3. Mayo Alzheimer's Disease Research Center [P50-AG16574]
  4. University of Kentucky AD Center [P30 AG028383]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)s that are essentially unequivocally associated with peripheral cholesterol. Since the alleles of the APOE gene, which modulate peripheral cholesterol metabolism, and midlife plasma cholesterol are both associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk, we have evaluated the hypothesis that SNPs associated with plasma cholesterol are also associated with AD. Results: Seventeen non-APOE SNPs reproducibly associated with cholesterol per GWAS were tested for association with AD in similar to 2,000 AD and similar to 4,000 non-AD subjects. As a group, these SNPs are associated with AD. Two SNPs in particular, rs3846662 and rs1532085, are associated with AD risk and age-of-onset. Additionally, rs3846662 was associated with HMGCR exon 13 splicing in human liver but not brain, possibly obscured by CNS cell-type heterogeneity. However, rs3846662 was associated with HMGCR exon 13 splicing in liver-and brain-derived cell lines. Conclusions: Cholesterol-associated SNPs outside of APOE confer a global risk for AD. Rs3846662 and rs1532085 are associated with both AD risk and age-of-onset. Rs3846662 is associated with HMGCR exon 13 inclusion. Since rs3846662 affects AD risk and age-of-onset as well as statin responsiveness, this SNP may confound clinical trials evaluating the protective effects of statins on AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据