4.6 Article

Amelioration of Diabetes-induced Cognitive Deficits by GSK-3β Inhibition is Attributed to Modulation of Neurotransmitters and Neuroinflammation

期刊

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 50, 期 2, 页码 390-405

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-014-8632-x

关键词

Glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta; Type 2 diabetes; Cognitive deficits; Neurotransmitter; Neuroinflammation

资金

  1. Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Government of India
  2. University Grant Commission, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic type 2 diabetes (T2D) causes cognitive deficits which are debilitating to the young as well as the older population. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK-3 beta) signaling has been reported to be impaired in insulin-resistant and T2D animal models. In this study, we have investigated the involvement of GSK-3 beta in cognitive deficits associated with T2D using SB216763, a GSK-3 beta inhibitor. In high-fat diet-streptozotocin (HFD-STZ) model of T2D in rats, cognitive deficits appeared on the 15th week after induction of diabetes. Treatment with GSK-3 beta inhibitor SB216763 (i.p. daily for 3 weeks) reversed impaired cognitive performance in the Morris water maze, Y-maze, and passive avoidance tests. Administration of SB216763 also significantly improved acetylcholine esterase activity, GABA, and glutamate levels in the hippocampus and cortex of diabetic rats. Importantly, GSK-3 beta inhibition showed an increase in pGSK-3 beta and pCREB expression and reduction in pNF-kappa B-p65 expression in both hippocampus and cortex. Neuroinflammation was reduced by SB216763 in diabetic rats as evident from reduction in IL-6, TNF-alpha, COX-2, and inducible nitric oxide synthase levels. This study suggests that cognitive deficits associated with diabetes involved intricate compartmental interaction between transcription factors and neurotransmitter homeostasis/energy metabolism, and GSK-beta might play a central role in diabetes-induced cognitive impairment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据