4.6 Article

Elevated Cerebral Cortical CD24 Levels in Patients and Mice with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Potential Negative Role in Nuclear Factor Kappa B/Inflammatory Factor Pathway

期刊

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 187-198

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-013-8509-4

关键词

Traumatic brain injury; CD24; Inflammatory response; Short hairpin RNA; Knockdown

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation, China [81171170, 8100053, 81271377]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing evidence indicates that sterile inflammatory response contributes to secondary brain injury following traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the specific mechanisms remain largely unknown, as is whether CD24, known as an important regulator in the non-infectious inflammatory response, plays a role in secondary brain injury after TBI. Here, the expression of CD24 was detected in samples from patients with TBI by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), western blotting, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. RNA interference was used to investigate the effects of CD24 on inflammatory response in a mouse model of TBI. Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) DNA-binding activity was measured by electrophoretic mobility shift assay, and the levels of downstream pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and Interleukin 1 beta (IL-1 beta) were detected by real-time PCR. The results indicated that both the mRNA and protein levels of CD24 were markedly elevated after TBI in humans and mice, showing a time-dependent expression. The expression of CD24 could be observed in neurons, astrocytes and microglia in both humans and mice. Meanwhile, downregulation of CD24 significantly induced an increase of NF-kappa B DNA-binding activity and mRNA levels of TNF-alpha and IL-1 beta. These findings indicated that CD24 expression could negatively regulate the NF-kappa B/inflammatory factor pathway after experimental TBI in mice, thus providing a novel target for therapeutic intervention of TBI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据