4.5 Article

Cx43 in mesenchymal stem cells promotes angiogenesis of the infarcted heart independent of gap junctions

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 1095-1102

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2014.1923

关键词

mesenchymal stem cells; connexins; angiogenic cytokines; myocardial infarction; gap junction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30800464, 30871077, 81200142]
  2. National Natural Science of Anhui province [1208085QH156, 1208085MH129]
  3. Research Foundation for Advanced Talents of Yijishan Hospital [YR201001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with elevated levels of connexin 43 (Cx43) have been shown to exhibit improved protection for ischemic hearts. However, it remains unclear whether Cx43 is involved in the paracrine actions of angiogenesis, the major mechanism of cell therapy. In the present study, an in vitro model with deprivation of oxygen and a murine myocardial infarction model with permanent ligation of the left anterior-descending (LAD) coronary artery were used to determine whether gap junctions in MSCs promote angiogenesis. It was observed that MSCs that overexpressed Cx43 (MSCs-Cx43), improve the cardiac function of infarcted myocardium as compared with control MSCs (MSCs-vector) and MSCs with Cx43 knocked down by small interfering RNA (MSCs-siCx43), accompanied with a reduction of infarct size and an increase in the vascular density and maturity. Increased levels of representative angiogenic factors [vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)] were produced by MSCs-Cx43 compared with MSCs-siCx43 in vivo and in vitro. However, neither Cx43 formed gap junction specific inhibitor (Cx43 mimetic peptide) or gap junction opener (antiarrhythmic peptide) affected the production of VEGF and bFGF in MSCs under hypoxic stress. These data support the hypothesis that Cx43 in MSCs promotes angiogenesis in the infarcted heart, independent of gap junction formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据