4.5 Article

Components of Panax notoginseng saponins enhance the cytotoxicity of cisplatin via their effects on gap junctions

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 897-902

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1597

关键词

ginsenoside Rg1; ginsenoside Rb1; notoginsenoside R1; cisplatin; gap junction

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20090461139]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of the Provincial Education Department of Anhui [KJ2008A167]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81001457]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previously, Panax notoginseng saponin (PNS)-induced enhancement of gap junction (GJ) formation or function was observed to be responsible for the increased cytotoxic action of cisplatin. PNS has three constituents, ginsenoside Rg1 and Rb1, and notoginsenoside R1. The active compounds in PNS responsible for enhancing the cytotoxicity of cisplatin remain unknown. Thus, the effects of the main components of PNS on the cytotoxicity of cisplatin were investigated, as well as the correlation with the modulation of GJ function in transfected He La cells. The cytotoxicity of cisplatin (0.25-1 mu g/ml) was increased in the presence of GJs. By contrast, the cytotoxicity of cisplatin was decreased when GJs were inhibited by a GJ blocker or by the inhibition of connexin expression. Ginsenoside Rg1 (100 mu M) and notoginsenoside R1 (100 mu M) were observed to significantly enhance cisplatin cytotoxicity in cells with functional GJs. Ginsenoside Rb1 had no effect on the cytotoxicity of cisplatin in the presence or absence of functional GJs. Cell exposure to ginsenoside Rg1 and notoginsenoside R1 for 4 h led to significant enhancement of a dye-coupled GJ in a dose-dependent manner; however, no effect was observed in cells exposed to ginsenoside Rb1. The present results indicate that ginsenoside Rg1 and notoginsenoside R1 are the active compounds responsible for enhancing the cytotoxic action of cisplatin induced by PNS in the presence of functional GJs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据