4.5 Article

Degradation-resistant protein domains limit host cell processing and immune detection of mycobacteria

期刊

MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 46, 期 7, 页码 1312-1318

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.11.008

关键词

Cytotoxic T cells; Protein; Domains; Mycobacteria; Proteasome; Ubiquitin

资金

  1. AcRF Tier 2 (Ministry of Education) [R182000085112]
  2. AcRF Tier 1 [R182000098112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome reveals a large family of glycine-alanine rich PE-PGRS proteins. Due to similarities with the glycine-alanine rich Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1, there has been interest in whether PE-PGRS proteins inhibit cellular processing and presentation via the major histocompatibility complex class I pathway. We investigated whether PE-PGRS proteins were resistant to ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent degradation and CD8(+) T cell recognition. Upon transient expression of ubiquitin fusion constructs of either full-length Rv0978c(PE-PGRS) protein or its PE domain in HeLa cells, the former was markedly less susceptible to proteasomal degradation. When peptides of varying glycine and alanine content from different PE-PGRS proteins were fused to the N-terminus of SIINFEKL peptide, the alanine-rich fusions elicited lower interleukin-2 responses in SIINFEKL-specific CD8(+) T cells, with corresponding decrease in lysis of cells presenting such peptides. When CD8(+) T cells from Mycobacterium bovis BCG-immunized mice were stimulated with either full-length PE-PGRS protein Rv3812 or its PE domain, the former exhibited a lower level of cytotoxicity against BCG-infected autologous macrophages. These results suggest that mycobacterium PE-PGRS proteins have domains that confer resistance to ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent protein degradation, and the bacteria may have an abundance of such proteins to evade immune detection and killing of mycobacterium-infected cells. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据