4.6 Article

Genomic assessment of follicular marker genes as pregnancy predictors for human IVF

期刊

MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 87-96

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gap079

关键词

gene expression; granulosa cells; infertility; ovarian follicle; pregnancy

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Embryo selection efficiency in human IVF procedure is still suboptimal as shown by low pregnancy rates with single embryo transfer (SET). Bidirectional communication between the oocyte and follicular cells (FC) is essential to achieve developmental competence of the oocyte. Differences in the gene expression profile of FCs from follicles leading to pregnancy could provide useful markers of oocyte developmental competence. FCs were recovered by individual follicle puncture. FC expression levels of potential markers were assessed by Q-PCR with an intra-patient and an inter-patient analysis approach. Using gene expression, a predictive model of ongoing pregnancy was investigated. Using intra-patient analysis, four candidate genes, phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1), regulator of G-protein signalling 2 (RGS2), regulator of G-protein signalling 3 (RGS3) and cell division cycle 42 (CDC42) showed a difference between FCs from follicles leading to a pregnancy or developmental failure. The best predictors for ongoing pregnancy were PGK1 and RGS2. Additionally, inter-patient analysis revealed differences in FC expression for PGK1 and CDC42 between follicles leading to a transferred embryo with positive pregnancy results and those with negative results. Both inter-patient and intra-patient approaches must be taken into consideration to delineate gene expression variations in the context of follicular competence. A predictor model using biomarkers could improve the efficiency of predicting developmental competence of oocytes. These new approaches provide useful tools in the context of embryo selection and in the improvement of pregnancy rates with SET.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据